| Click the links below to view the latest news. |
| |
|
| |
In patients with squamous cell cancer of the mouth, imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) detected more hidden lymph node metastases in the neck than computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These results were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Oral cancer refers to cancer that involves the mouth, lips, or tongue. A majority of cases of oral cancer are linked with tobacco use. High alcohol intake also increases the risk of oral cancer.
Because oral cancer can spread to lymph nodes in the neck, treatment of oral cancer may involve surgical removal or irradiation of these lymph nodes. While it would be optimal to reserve lymph node treatment for those patients with lymph node metastases, it can be difficult to determine in advance whether lymph node metastases are present. Some lymph node metastases are too small to be felt. They may also be missed by conventional imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
To determine whether an alternative imaging technique—FDG-PET—can be used to identify hidden lymph node metastases in the neck, researchers in Taiwan conducted a study among 134 patients with oral cancer. None of the patients had lymph node metastases that could be felt by palpating the neck. Before surgical removal of the lymph nodes of the neck, patients underwent imaging with FDG-PET and CT or MRI.
-
Surgery detected lymph node metastases in 26% of the patients.
-
FDG-PET detected more lymph node metastases than CT or MRI. FDG-PET detected 51% of patients with lymph node metastases, compared to 31% for CT or MRI.
- Overall, the probability of a false-negative result using FDG-PET was 6.7% for patients with T1 tumors (tumors smaller than 2 cm); 10.8% for patients with T2 tumors (tumors between 2 cm and 4 cm); 13.3% for patients with T3 tumors (tumors larger than 4 cm); and 25% for patients with T4 tumors (tumors that invade nearby tissue).
The researchers conclude that FDG-PET was superior to CT or MRI for detecting hidden lymph node metastases in the neck. The performance of FDG-PET was not perfect, however; it produced false-negative results in up to 13% of patients with T1-T3 tumors. In patients with T4 tumors, it produced false-negative results in 25% of patients. Ng S-H, Yen T-C, Chang T-C et al. Prospective Study of [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Palpably Negative Neck. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24:4371-4376.
According to an article published in the American Journal of Medicine, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and smoking increase the risk of developing laryngeal cancer.
Laryngeal cancer is considered a type of head and neck cancer and occurs in the larynx, which may also be referred to as the "voice box". Smoking and alcohol are thought to increase the risk of laryngeal cancer.
GERD, also referred to as heartburn, is a condition in which the acidic contents of the stomach back up into the esophagus (the tube that connects the throat to the stomach). GERD may be responsible for the irritation of tissues of the esophagus, a condition referred to as Barrett’s esophagus.
Researchers from the Cleveland Clinic recently conducted a study to evaluate potential effects of GERD on laryngeal cancer. This study included 96 patients with laryngeal cancer and 192 patients who did not have laryngeal cancer.
The researchers concluded that smoking and GERD increase the risk of developing laryngeal cancer. Only future clinical trials can determine if intervention against GERD can help reduce the risk of developing laryngeal cancer. Patients who smoke or have GERD may wish to speak with their physician regarding their individual risks of developing laryngeal cancer, as well as potential treatments for GERD.
Vaezi MF, Sepi M, Lopez R, et al. Laryngeal cancer and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a case control study. The American Journal of Medicine. 2006;119:768-776.
continue to page 2 > l back to top ^
|